
Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness
Sign in to keep track of books you’ve read and want to read.
In the years since Daniel Dennett's influential Consciousness Explainedwas published in 1991, scientific research on consciousness has been a hotly contested battleground of rival theories — "so rambunctious," Dennett observes, "that several people are writing books just about the tumult." With Sweet Dreams, Dennett returns to the subject for "revision and renewal" of his theory of consciousness, taking into account major empirical advances in the field since 1991 as well as recent theoretical challenges.
Read more
In Consciousness Explained, Dennett proposed to replace the ubiquitous but bankrupt Cartesian Theater model (which posits a privileged place in the brain where "it all comes together" for the magic show of consciousness) with the Multiple Drafts Model. Drawing on psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, he asserted that human consciousness is essentially the mental software that reorganizes the functional architecture of the brain. In Sweet Dreams, he recasts the Multiple Drafts Model as the "fame in the brain" model, as a background against which to examine the philosophical issues that "continue to bedevil the field."
With his usual clarity and brio, Dennett enlivens his arguments with a variety of vivid examples. He isolates the "Zombic Hunch" that distorts much of the theorizing of both philosophers and scientists, and defends heterophenomenology, his "third-person" approach to the science of consciousness, against persistent misinterpretations and objections. The old challenge of Frank Jackson's thought experiment about Mary the color scientist is given a new rebuttal in the form of "RoboMary," while his discussion of a famous card trick, "The Tuned Deck," is designed to show that David Chalmers's Hard Problem is probably just a figment of theorists' misexploited imagination. In the final essay, the "intrinsic" nature of "qualia" is compared with the naively imagined "intrinsic value" of a dollar in "Consciousness — How Much is That in Real Money?"
Liked Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness? Here’s where I’d start.
These suit anyone who liked Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness. Sign in and mark a few books for picks shaped around your own taste.
-
The Engine of Reason, The Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain Shares philosophy, mind, science -
The Mystery Of Consciousness Shares philosophy, philosophy of mind, consciousness -
The Rediscovery of the Mind Shares philosophy, mind, consciousness -
The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory Shares philosophy, philosophy of mind, consciousness
“People who read Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness tend to reach for these next.”
-
Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited
-
Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings
-
Conversations on Consciousness: What the Best Minds Think about the Brain, Free Will, and What It Means to Be Human
- What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason